Amelie Van Impe vs Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jun at 01:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Van Impe vs J. Matos Sequeira Fernandes

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Impe 1 - 0 Fernandes
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amelie Van Impe winning 2 and Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes winning 0. The last match between Amelie Van Impe and Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes was at the W15 Bolszewo, 19-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Amelie Van Impe getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Impe | 1 |
| Fernandes | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Bolszewo(06-19-25)
A. V. Impe vs J. M. S. Fernandes H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.06% (123-69) | Career Total W/L | 51.15% (67-64) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. V. Impe vs J. M. S. Fernandes Match Preview:
- Who performs better in second serve points recently? Fernandes, slightly edging Impe with 39.06% compared to 38.57%, suggesting a marginal advantage in this area.
- Impe excels in return games, having won 53.7% of opponents' second serve points, noticeably higher than Fernandes' 46.15%. Will this be a decisive factor?
- When it comes to returning first serves, Impe again has a slight edge with 35.95% over Fernandes' 35.56%.
- Under pressure scenarios show Fernandes as more resilient, saving 50% of breakpoints compared to Impe’s 47.24%.
- Overall match performance in the past year leans towards Impe, with a win rate of 66.67% (W/L 30/15) against Fernandes' 60.98% (W/L 25/16).
- Both players favor clay surfaces, but Impe holds a stronger win percentage on clay at 67% compared to Fernandes' 56%.
- In recent competition levels, Impe's performance outshines Fernandes, winning 72.73% of matches in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, while Fernandes has won 60.53% in similar events.
- Against higher-ranked opponents, Fernandes has experience facing stronger competition, with an average opponent rank of 306 compared to Impe’s 378.13.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Impe has shown better composure, winning 64% of deciding sets, while Fernandes has a 57% win rate.
- In terms of break point conversion, Impe succeeds in converting 45.11% of opportunities, outperforming Fernandes who converts at a rate of 36.14%.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match features two players with specific strengths and weaknesses. Recent statistics indicate that Impe has an overall superior edge in return games and breakpoint conversion.
Fernandes, on the other hand, has faced tougher competition, which could translate into an advantage under pressure scenarios and in second serve performance.
Considering the ability to close matches in deciding sets and better breakpoint conversion, Impe may hold a slight upper hand. Ultimately, Impe appears more likely to secure a victory in this matchup, leveraging their consistency in key performance areas.
Amelie Van Impe vs Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. V. Impe vs J. M. S. Fernandes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:58:30 | Average Match Time | 0:58:30 |
| 76% (19/25) | 1st Serve % | 53% (16/30) |
| 74% (14/19) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 67% (4/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (5/14) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 63% (19/30) | Return Points Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. V. Impe Recent Matches Played
J. M. S. Fernandes Recent Matches Played

A. V. Impe vs J. M. S. Fernandes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.06% (123/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.15% (67/64) |
| 62.73% (276/164) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.72% (150/140) |
| 55.23% (2198/1782) | Games Win/Loss | 52.75% (1345/1205) |
| 61.82% (34/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 67.26% (76/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.47% (54/47) |
| 54.17% (13/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 206 | Aces Total | 88 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 548 | Total Double Faults | 254 |
| 1:33:56 | Average Match Time | 1:3:53 |
| 476.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.15 |
| 65% (7315/11335) | 1st Serve % | 52% (2355/4509) |
| 61% (4437/7315) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1386/2355) |
| 46% (1845/4020) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (979/2154) |
| 51% (784/1542) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (282/609) |
| 48% (5546/11548) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2073/4415) |
| 53.33% (40/35) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
| 70.94% (83/34) | Futures W/L | 54.39% (62/52) |
| 65% (123/190) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (66/130) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (22/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 48% (28/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 86% (127/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (65/60) |
| 14% (127/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (65/5) |
| 22% (65/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (66/6) |